According The Associated Press:
Harry had been expected to deploy to southern Iraq in the next few weeks but Army Chief of Staff Gen. Sir Richard Dannatt, who recently traveled to Iraq, said the situation there had become too dangerous and media scrutiny of the plans had exacerbated the situation.
The 22-year-old prince, who had long dreamed of leading his tank unit in Iraq, said he is disappointed but respected the decision.
Dannatt said the move was due to specific threats to the prince and risks to the safety of his fellow soldiers.
"There have been a number of specific threats, some reported and some not reported, that relate directly to Prince Harry as an individual," Dannatt said. "These threats exposed him and those around him to a degree of risk I considered unacceptable."
The decision comes three days after insurgents claimed to have captured three U.S. servicemen and amid claims that militia groups were making plans for Harry's arrival in Iraq.
Media reports have said Iraqi insurgents planned to kill or kidnap the prince, and have circulated his photograph among militants in the southern city of Basra. One newspaper report quoted a militia leader saying he planned to take the prince hostage and to send him back to his grandmother — Queen Elizabeth II — "without his ears."
READ THE FULL REPORT @ http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070516/ap_on_re_eu/britain_prince_harry
ALSO I THINK IF PRINCE HARRY DID GO TO IRAQ, HE WOULD HAVE NOT ONLY PUT HIMSELF IN DANGER BUT THE LIVES OF HIS FELLOW SOLDIERS AS WELL...
I THINK THIS WAS A GOOD DECISION...
Article from Associated Press VIA:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070516/ap_on_re_eu/britain_prince_harry
Photo Source: Associated Press Photo (AP Photo)
No comments:
Post a Comment